While I write from a back-up monitor I hoped not to used, I need to go over some things with the newest version of Stable Diffusion 3:

The old model that I had been using for attempting my so somewhat attempt of a game in RPG Maker MV, I found with Moonbeam, that it's been relatively useful, though quite a bit bashed at coming up with new monster design that AI can think of (it seems to be good a randomly generating monsters names that seems to populate an image).

However, with the newly release Stable Diffusion 3, these monsters though highly detailed are almost in the eyesore category versus the seamless designs that old configuration that many gambles would allows to permeate the AI image platform. Though I am little trusting of the AI monsters (please see aforementioned), I am quite on the fence about where the designed point of view is coming from due to having these now odd designs become the standard footprint:

The Fallen King (Boss) old design:

New Stable Diffusion:

A part of me wants to like the newly updated imagery, but considering that both architectures are asking for the same blueprint, I just don't know how I could fit the new design in. I have a little trepidation on how the change are not really taking a serious evaluation as to what they are expecting on the developer side, but just trying to incorporate as many details as possible without a meaningful approach to what the design is supposed to be. It just felt like too many people are trying to make something cool versus have designs that have proper implementation.

I'm just writing my thoughts as I was reviewing what it is today, and how it's changes dramatically over a single year. I don't really know what to make of the new designs, but I just think that maybe they should slow down and really think over the incorporation of the designs versus just trying to upgrade for no reason.

That's just me.